| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Boom Laison
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
2
   |
Posted - 2015.09.11 07:10:04 -
[1] - Quote
erg cz wrote:1. Decline in numbers of online players does not mean decline in number of fights. High PLEX price simply switched off more alt accounts, than multy boxers hammer itself.
2. EvE is PVP game? Yes, but it is the worst MMO PvP game currently on the market. So newbies go away pretty quick.
2.1. Eve solo PvP means longer waiting time, tens of minutes of boredrom before you get fight . In extreme cases even hours of browsing empty null till you find equal or weaker opponent for you SOLO fight.
2.2. Eve team PvP mean longer waiting time till your team is ready and aligned and enemy team is ready and aligned or someone happens to run into your lovely gank. Wait, wait, wait...
2.3. Apart from FW you have no way to ensure any kind of fair fight. It is very unlikely to fight T3 cruiser with your destroyer and win. Plenty of other MMO offer some form of match making.
3. EvE is not for free. War thunder, Wargaming etc... offer almost instant PvP with good matchmaking for free.
4. EvE really sucks in advertising. World of tanks jumps on you from TV, EvE is not visible even in google ads.
5. With all great potential of perfect Sci-fi world EvE PvE conent is repetitive and ... let say limited. What is the problem of adding more L4 missions? COSMOS? Epic archs? Stats shows, that most newbie players try PvE before PvP and try it hard. So make PvE interesting for them so they stay and get involved into team PvP later on.
Cause EvE is good in team PvP.
Exactly this! |
Boom Laison
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2015.09.17 11:16:11 -
[2] - Quote
Cancel Align NOW wrote: But when I posted there were 15 posts within 2 pages dscussing plex prices in this thread. Hence this thread is now about plex prices.
Because it is PLEX prices first of all, that killed 1/3 of population in high sec and keep demolition of the target pool? Some ppl can afford themselves to subscribe account financially, but can not do it for social reasons. Like wife hates the game so much, that giving her more reasons to hassle is just not worth it. So - less players in this sandbox... |
Boom Laison
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2015.09.17 11:39:28 -
[3] - Quote
Fred Vendetta wrote:They need only stop people from hoarding dozens of them. I doubt they'll ever have to ban anyone because once it has been outlawed it would be stupid to try to hoard them.
1. Make game time available for AUR, not for PLEX.
2. Allow maximum of 24 PLEXes be converted for aurum, per account / year.
Problem fixed. |
Boom Laison
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
10
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 11:15:50 -
[4] - Quote
erg cz wrote:I used to look at sell orders count, provided by eve-marketdata. I find it to be very interesting especialy now. In the middle of june 2012 there was a large boom in numbers, which raised the numbers up to the level , where they were till the beginning of this summer... The whole summer sell order numbers were falling down to the level, where they were 3 years ago. It is not a spike, it is clear tendency. So what happened in the middle of 2012? Why there was a sudden raise in market activity? And why we lost inlast two month almost 50% of the market ? I seriosly doubt it is because players start unsubscriding PLEXed market alts...
FW changes in Inferno patch? Maybe the rewamp FW as main tool to deliver rair fights for newbies is all we need... |
Boom Laison
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
26
|
Posted - 2015.09.25 07:40:00 -
[5] - Quote
According to eve offline graphs game now has same amount of active players as in year 2007 - 2008. |
| |
|